Resources

Getting Started

Since the 1970s, the “best practices” of inclusive pedagogy have shifted with developments in research. We are fortunate to be guided with this wealth of constantly-evolving knowledge; however, the enormous body of literature may be a barrier to understanding and implementing inclusive pedagogy. Additionally, no individual inclusive educational strategy is sufficient on its own to ensure inclusivity; a holistic, flexible integration of multiple strategies that adapts to the needs of students is essential, and will require changing iterations as best practices evolve and you learn what works well in your courses. The Chicago Center for Teaching and Learning has assembled the following list to help you make small changes that have been found to have high positive impacts on students’ educational experiences. Each of the points below is a starting place and links to more substantive web-based guides or peer-reviewed resources.

Design an Inclusive Syllabus

In addition to outlining the overall structure of your course, a syllabus gives you an opportunity to convey your approach to and expectations for inclusivity. Attention to inclusivity in the syllabus models for students the climate that you hope to achieve in your course.

    The syllabus is one of the first impressions that students receive of your course and teaching style. Using a “positive, respectful, and inviting” tone off the bat can begin to establish a sense of trust with students. The CCTL Syllabus Guide identifies several considerations, including: 

    • Using first- and second-person pronouns (we, you, I) to demonstrate your commitment to creating a collaborative learning environment where student contributions are valued. 
    • Conveying your enthusiasm about the material and students’ engagement with it. 

    For more discussion on syllabus tone, consider exploring Russell Johnson’s Teaching Spotlight, “Expectations and Tone in Syllabus Construction”. 

    Diversity statements show how you value and respect diversity and emphasize an understanding that individual difference is a necessary and valuable precursor to cultivating an atmosphere of open intellectual exchange. A sample diversity statement can be found in both the CCTL Syllabus Guide and Faculty Teaching Handbook

    Student learning does not occur in a vacuum. Without access to resources to address students’ physical, social, and emotional needs, it can be extremely difficult for them to learn to their fullest potential. The University of Chicago offers a variety of student support resources, ranging from student counseling, to emergency financial assistance, to support for disability support, and more. For a list of UChicago resources for student support, please explore the Faculty Teaching Handbook

Share Your Course Expectations

Clearly stating learning outcomes, assessment criteria, and participation expectations are helpful for all students. Being transparent about these expectations is especially helpful for learners without prior knowledge of the University culture. 

    As students adjust to the university and the standards of scholarship associated each of their courses, it is important to “set clear policies at the beginning of class, discuss these policies, and review them” throughout the academic year. The “Expectations, Course Flexibility, and Student Engagement” report from the CCTL Working Group offers guidance for articulating course policies related to attendance, late assignments, grades, and College policies. 

    Expectations about class participation can highly vary across academic disciplines, course types, and instructors. Provide students with examples of rich and meaningful engagement in your course, which can help clarify your own expectations while lowering student anxiety about participating. Examples include:  

    • Asking students to arrive to class with a selected quotation or passage to discuss. 
    • Asking students to prepare 2-3 questions about a particular topic or assignment. 
    • Asking students to identify a practice problem that they struggled with. 

    As the CCTL Syllabus Guide identifies, instructors can also consider "building in opportunities for participation that may take place outside the classroom, such as office hours, discussion posts on Canvas, and the like.”

Prioritize Accessibility

Students from across the University have visible and invisible disabilities and identities (e.g., first generation status is not “visible” as race is sometimes “visible”). Offering information about and resources related to disability support to all students enables support without requiring students to self-disclose their identities.  

    ISBN numbers and library links allow low-income students and/or students with disabilities to find versions of required texts that are adaptable to their specific needs (e.g., adaptable for screen readers or that have audio versions available). This addition can also assist students in locating lower-cost or free versions of course texts. 

    Consider including a disability statement in your syllabus or reviewing the accommodation process on the first day of class. Sample statements can be located in the Faculty Teaching Handbook. 

    The Center for Digital Accessibility (CDA) at UChicago offers monthly trainings on different topics related to digital accessibility. Consider registering for a live virtual training or exploring the CDA’s asynchronous trainings and resources.

Be Available for Students

Undergraduate students are more likely to persist and thrive in university settings where there is high-quality and frequent student-faculty interaction (Hoffman, 2014). Positive formal and informal interactions with students facilitates cognitive skills development, academic self-challenge, and a greater sense of belonging (Kim & Lundberg, 2016). 

    Students may experience office hours for the first time at the University of Chicago. In addition, different instructors may have different expectations about how office hours should be utilized, how often students should attend, and so on. Be explicit and offer examples of the uses of office hours, such as: 

    • Building professional relationships with your professors 
    • Discussing questions or concerns they have in your course 
    • Chatting about course materials

    When possible, be available near your classroom before or after class for informal conversation and/or course help for students. Not only can this serve as an opportunity for relationship building for students, but it also provides additional opportunities for students to receive course support.

Reduce Anonymity and "Increase Humanity"

Positive interactions and professional relationships between educators and students build the type of social capital necessary for self-efficacy in learning (Brouwer et al., 2016), enrollment in graduate programs, and post-graduate professional advancement. 

    To help you learn your students’ names and pronouns, consider: 

    • Printing out a photo roster (available through FacultyAccess) to help associate preferred names and pronouns with faces.  
    • Asking students to say their names before they ask a question or share a thought.  
    • Exploring NameCoach, available through Canvas, which allows students and instructors to record how they would like their names to be pronounced. 

    Encourage students to get to know their classmates’ names and pronouns when sharing ideas to establish a friendlier and more collegial classroom environment throughout the quarter. 

    Our cultural backgrounds influence what it means to be respectful in interactions, and faculty and instructors choose to be addressed in a variety of ways (e.g., Dr., Professor) that may not be obvious to students. Direct communication about how you would like to addressed can help limit student confusion or anxiety when they interact with you.

    This practice models life-long learning, encourages development of students’ passion, and helps them see potential paths into your discipline.

Setting and Monitoring Class Climate

An inclusive classroom climate helps students learn (Britton, 2017). Because culture is often co-constructed and jointly maintained among individuals, we offer a few strategies in this section that helps to set and maintain a collaborative climate among educators and students.

    Explicitly establishing classrooms norms helps to maintain an inclusive environment and signals to students the type of contributions that are important for learning. Topics to discuss include:  

    • How students should engage during discussion or lecture (e.g., raise their hands, speak freely, refer to each other by name, introduce themselves before making a comment, etc.). 
    • Modeling how disagreements are respectfully handled. 

    For more information on establishing a strong class climate, please view the Inclusive Discussions webpage.

    Use terms for groups of people that are respectful in current times.  

    • Prioritize non-gendered terms (e.g., “folks” or “people” rather than “men” or “women”; “first-year students” rather than “freshmen”). 
    • Prioritize contemporary language to refer a racial or ethnic group (e.g., “Black” or “African-American”) even if texts use terms that were considered appropriate for the historical era in which they were written. Note that some terms are contested because some argue that environments, not people, create stigma (e.g., person-first or identity-first language). 
    • We invite you to explore Disability Inclusive Language Guidelines or Inclusive Language: Race & Ethnicity for more guidance. 

    Consider requesting a CCTL Midcourse Review (MCR) to collect information from your students about how they are experiencing the course. In an MCR, a member of the CCTL staff conducts a 20-minute focus group with your students about halfway through the quarter and will meet with you to discuss the results. This service is confidential and is meant to provide constructive, in-depth feedback on your teaching from the perspective of your students.

Encourage a Growth Mindset

Growth mindset, a concept developed by psychologist Carol Dweck, is the belief that an individuals’ intelligence and learning abilities are not fixed but can be developed with time and effort. Individuals with a growth mindset are more persistent with setbacks, learn from feedback, and view failures as opportunities for growth, rather than as reflections of fixed abilities (Claro et al., 2016). By fostering a learning environment where effort, resilience, and diverse perspectives are valued, educators help students practice educational resiliency through the development of a growth mindset. 

    Connecting students’ existing knowledge to the new concepts in your course helps students see their intellectual growth and aids in information recall. 

    In addition to explaining your own academic journey and what brought you to your field, let students see how and what you’ve learned from your failures. This helps to normalize failure as an integral part of the learning process. Melanie Stefan presents this idea in her article “A CV of failures,” and Johannes Haushofer offers an example.

In addition to the small strategies listed above, we invite you to explore the following webpages for more tailored strategies for different course types.

 

References

Britton, D. M. (2017). Beyond the chilly climate: The salience of gender in women’s academic careers. Gender & society, 31(1), 5-27. 

Brouwer, J., Jansen, E., Flache, A., & Hofman, A. (2016). The impact of social capital on self-efficacy and study success among first-year university students. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 109-118. 

Claro, S., Paunesku, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(31), 8664-8668.  

Dewsbury, B. & Brame, C.J. (2019a) Evidence Based Teaching Guide: Inclusive Teaching. CBE Life Science Education. Retrieved from https://lse.ascb.org/evidence-based-teaching-guides/inclusive-teaching/https://lse.ascb.org/evidence-based-teaching-guides/inclusive-teaching/ 

Dewsbury, B., & Brame, C. J. (2019b). Inclusive teaching. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-01-0021  

Florian, L., and Spratt, J. (2013). Enacting inclusion: A framework for interrogating inclusive practice, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(2), 119–135. 

Hoffman, E. M. (2014). Faculty and student relationships: Context matters. College Teaching, 62(1), 13-19.  

Kim, Y. K., & Lundberg, C. A. (2016). A structural model of the relationship between student–faculty interaction and cognitive skills development among college students. Research in Higher Education, 57, 288-309. 

Stentiford, L., & Koutsouris, G. (2021). What are inclusive pedagogies in higher education? A systematic scoping review. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2245-2261.